Stephen Paddock is logically a Leftist, probably Democrat

It only makes sense.

Being transparent and open, I do not know for sure about this.  But it follows from the known facts.  Consider:

The shooter in the Las Vegas mass murder intentionally selected as his target a group of Country-Western music aficionados.  Overwhelmingly,  Country-Western music enthusiasts are pro-American and therefore voted for Donald Trump.  One concludes the shooter suffers from anti-Trump or Trump Derangement Syndrome.

It is silly and illogical to suggest a pro-American would select such a target group.

 

The shooter made sure the mass murder would fit the pre-arranged claims of the Left aligned Democrat Continuum.  Sure enough, on cue, all the wild eyed Leftists were primed and ready to deploy the ‘ban guns’ paranoid delusion.  (Almost as if they were expecting the incident?)

It is silly and illogical to suggest a pro-American would damage the Second Amendment in such manner.

 

The shooter didn’t want to face his victims.  They weren’t real people to him, just ‘them’.  Very typical of Leftist thought and behavior.

All the pro-American people I know are rather ‘person oriented’, at least in this sense.  Very few are back shooters.  Pro-American people tend to consider the consequence of their actions more carefully.

 

The shooter killed himself rather than face the public, the justice system or the real world.

That is self-evident and I’ll leave it alone.

 

The last bit of known fact presumes Mr. Paddock was in fact the murderer.  If Mr. Paddock was deployed only as a decoy, scape-goat or red-herring, the actual murderer fit into the first three items and then killed Mr. Paddock to cover his crimes.

At the very least the Las Vegas murderer committed his crime to assist the Left, based on logical thought.

 

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under General Idiocy, Idiot Politicians, Life in General, Nation, Political Correctness, Politics

4 responses to “Stephen Paddock is logically a Leftist, probably Democrat

  1. Alex

    You actually make it appear really easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually one thing that I think I’d never understand. It seems too complex and very wide for me. I am taking a look forward on your subsequent post, I will attempt to get the hold of it!

    • I will agree this sort of thing is complex and very wide. However, I try to run with the facts and logic. I may well have to admit at some point the assumptions behind and facts as presented may be in error.

      Much like buying a car.

      Feel free to drop in and comment. Disagree with me if you feel the need. Just have an argument better than “I don’t like that!”

  2. Ann Curtis

    Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all folks you really realize what you are talking about! Bookmarked. Please additionally consult with my web site =). We will have a link exchange agreement between us!

  3. Hopefully, the logic is sound. And all this is based on third party news reports. (I am privy to no ‘inside’ information.) Thank you for your kind words.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s