Category Archives: Much Ado About Nothing

I Now Have Another Gripe…

The title reminds me of an old mock up cartoon drawing of Daffy Duck in a foul mood (as if he had alternatives) saying, “Daily I am forced (forthed) to add to the every growing list (litht) of people who can just kiss (kith) my … [- uh – tailfeathers]!”

I like Brownell’s company for firearms parts and tools. I’ve used them. I have an account with them. They’re good people. But the advertising…

The ‘catch my attention’ line in the email is “Don’t settle for the same old gun!” So I’m already a bit chaffed. I’ve carried this old Colt (lightweight) Commander in .45 Awfulmatic for a number of years and had it longer. I like it. I like what it does. I have no intention – and regardless of ‘deal’ – to change it for something – Lord help me! – new.

Then I opened the advertisement. It shows a pistol – looks like a Glock – with ‘enhanced’ sights, a holographic sight along with the sights, an extended barrel with a boss or lug on the end, a flashlight or laser beam attached under the slide/barrel, fancy decorative milling on the slide and and oversized base to the magazine. I cannot see it, of course, but I would imagine a beveled magazine well.

I carry my Commander as a concealed weapon. It is already big enough to hide. I do not need all that foo-foo crap to hide as well.

I do have high visibility fixed sights and some work on the trigger. That does not add any weight or size to the pistol. The pistol is sighted in with the load I carry and I am confident of hitting a human silhouette from the muzzle to in excess of fifty yards (depends on how the eyes focus that day; I’m getting old.) Head shots only to twenty-five to thirty yards.

No, I’m not ‘settling’. No, I do not require a ‘new gun’!

Leave a comment

Filed under Firearms and their use, General Idiocy, Much Ado About Nothing, Self Revelation

Charles Manson is Getting Married!

By now everyone has heard this news.  Eighty-year-old Charles Manson, infamous as the so-called brains behind the Sharon Tate and Leno / Rosemary LaBianca murders.  A total of seven people.

Now a twenty-six year old woman has decided Mr. Manson is innocent and the two of them have a marriage license.  Afton Elaine Burton is the blushing bride.

Strange things happen, I suppose.

Perhaps I should feel ‘encouraged’.  Perhaps there is a woman for me in my old age.  But I don’t want to murder seven reasonably innocuous people and go to prison for life to find her.  I know:  Picky, picky, picky…

Leave a comment

Filed under General Idiocy, Life in General, Much Ado About Nothing

From the “You’ve Got to Be Kidding!” file

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/23/clinton-im-not-truly-well-off/

Hillary Rodham Clinton, former (annoying)  First Lady, former (mediocre but Liberal) Senator from New York State, former (wretched) Secretary of State – announced she and her husband President William J. “Bill” Clinton were ‘broke’ when they left the White House.  Which may explain why they attempted to steal all the dinner ware and many other items not permanently attached when they left.

Even for a leftist with a by-nature tenuous hold on reality, Madam Secretary shows an amazing ability to deceive herself about her financial status AND the stupidity of the listening public.

What does it mean to a woman with more money than most of us will ever earn in a lifetime to be ‘broke’?  Does that mean she cannot buy a Senate seat without others to pitch in with the purchase price?  How does she keep a straight face saying this sort of stuff?  Stephen Wright keeps a straight face during his monologues, but everyone involved knows he’s presenting ‘humor’, not absolute fact.  The late Buster Keaton was known for his deadpan delivery and acting, but I understand he sometimes laughed on set and had to shoot the same sequence more than once.  But not Madam Secretary.

Seriously, folks; can you believe this?  She charges – according to the article – “… a six figure speaking fee …”  (a minimum of $ 100,000.00 just to be clear) for her speaking engagements.  (In comparison, I get about $36,000 a year from my retirement/Social Insecurity payments.  I collect guns, support a son in university and I’m mostly comfortable.  What the blazes does she do with her money?)  But she’s not “… truly well off …” she says.  AND she claims her income comes from ‘hard work’.  Frankly, I could foul up foreign policy and then lie about it in front of credulous graduates for much less.  What’s so ‘hard work’ about being a protected, pampered, ignorant loser?

Oh.  She wants to be President of the United States.  Does it warm the cockles of your heart knowing she would be a President who identifies with us ‘lesser’ folk?

1 Comment

Filed under Civilization, General Idiocy, Idiot Politicians, Much Ado About Nothing, Political Correctness, Politics, Silliness

No, I’m Not Going to Buy Energy Drinks

While perusing television as of late, I have been involuntary witness to any number of commercials. Commercials are of course what pays for television production, so on the few shows I like to watch – mostly fictional detective programs – I find commercials a proper time to visit the loo, pet the dog, scratch or find something upon which to snack.

Every twice in a while though, I see a commercial. One cannot always be relieving, petting, scratching or snacking.

One of those commercials is the one featuring a young man, seemingly good looking, healthy and of not more than 30 winters in age. The young man in question is telling of all he has accomplished in the past five hours with the energy drink being promoted.

In the past five hours, he has run a marathon while knitting a sweater, learned to play guitar while reading a book, and become a Ping Pong ‘master’ while recording his debut album.

He asserts the use of the energy drink has enabled him to accomplish all these feats. In five hours.

My thought is, if such a healthy young man suffers such hallucinations and is thrust into such a delusional state, what might it do to a run-down, slight off kilter, old coot like me?

I’ll stick with Scotch. Much safer.

4 Comments

Filed under Civilization, Life in General, Much Ado About Nothing, Speculation

An Odd Bit of News Tucked Away From the Front Page…

I’m not sure what this means, but I just noted a news article about something odd in southern Mexico. One of the larger small indigenous groups of Indians have gone missing. They seem to have gone missing nearly a week ago now. They were in the area of Yucatan and Quintana Roo.

Leave a comment

Filed under Civilization, Much Ado About Nothing

The “Was Jesus Really Married?” Sensation

For those who follow such things, it’s the news.

A small portion of papyrus has come to light with some Coptic writing on it. It is a ‘scrap’, almost literally. The portion has been removed from a larger section of papyrus, from the pictures shown, cut from a page. For identification purposes, it has been given the name, “The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife”. I find that both grandiose and presumptuous, but they didn’t consult with me.

Here is the sensation part: One line – a partial line without the beginning or the end of the sentence – of the text reads “… Jesus says unto them, My wife …” Another line mentions ‘Mary’. A preceding line mentions “… my mother gave to me life…” Since there were several women named Mary who were associated with Jesus during his ministry – including his mother – one cannot decisively say just which Mary is mentioned in the fragment.

Karen King, the professor-scholar who has custody of the fragment, and is the principal studying the fragment announced that preliminary investigation shows the fragment probably to be from Greek and about 300 years after the termination of Christ’s ministry on Earth. She has said due to the temporal remoteness, it is probably not a valid source regarding Jesus’ biography; i.e., it isn’t really a clear proof of Jesus being married. The preliminary investigation indicates the fragment is genuine Coptic writing from the Fourth Century, but tests are ongoing to establish the origin of the fragment beyond a reasonable doubt.

So, even if absolutely legitimate in terms of writing, the fragment represents writing of the Fourth Century and nothing contemporaneous with the Earthly ministry of Jesus. Even if absolutely legitimate in terms of age and authorship (which it may well be), it is incomplete and therefore without context.

Christians have typically believed Jesus was a single and celibate man all His time on Earth. The Bible records no marriage, no ‘girl-friend’ in the current sense and no off spring. In fact, due to the unique nature of Jesus – that of being “… very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father…” there would be no point to Him marrying or fathering children. (There are, of course, other views regarding Jesus’ sex life, but they are not mainstream Christian views and have no Biblical basis.)

The Bible does however speak of Jesus coming marriage and his future wife. The ‘church’ is the Bride of Christ and several references in the New Testament speak of the ‘Wedding Feast of the Lamb’, which will happen when His followers are re-united with the God Head at the end of time.

So, for all my Christian brothers and sisters, let’s not get too worked up over this yet. (For all my non-Christian readers, don’t order the champagne just yet.) This is about as important as the ossuary of James – if one recalls that silliness. Even if genuine, it isn’t a full sentence and therefore has NO meaning.

I’m hoping the rest of the papyrus document shows up. From how this fragment was ‘found’, one can postulate more of it exists. The rest of the original document will surely shed light on the meaning of the fragments available. In the meanwhile, various outlets are sensationalizing the find in an effort to sell copy. Like that’s something novel.

For more details about the research going on, see http://www.hds.harvard.edu/faculty-research/research-projects/the-gospel-of-jesuss-wife

Leave a comment

Filed under Christianity, Much Ado About Nothing